Comments for The Place to Be http://tomt2u.wordpress.com Tomt2U's blogs for the Spatial Science community. Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:09:32 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Is Keyhole Markup Language (KML) becoming the defacto Spatial Transfer Protocol? by hadid http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2006/06/26/is-keyhole-markup-language-kml-becoming-the-defacto-spatial-transfer-protocol/#comment-1244 hadid Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:09:32 +0000 https://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2006/06/26/is-keyhole-markup-language-kml-becoming-the-defacto-spatial-transfer-protocol/#comment-1244 i need kml for gis i need kml for gis

]]> Comment on Chair’s Message – SSI Qld Journal Autumn 2009 by Tomt2U http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/chair%e2%80%99s-message-ssi-qld-journal-autumn-2009/#comment-1241 Tomt2U Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:01:53 +0000 http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-1241 Thankyou rosalinda. The blog is predominately where I place the articles I write for the SSI Journal. Thankyou rosalinda. The blog is predominately where I place the articles I write for the SSI Journal.

]]> Comment on Chair’s Message – SSI Qld Journal Autumn 2009 by rosalinda http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/chair%e2%80%99s-message-ssi-qld-journal-autumn-2009/#comment-1240 rosalinda Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:31:58 +0000 http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-1240 Interesting Read! Very detailed blog. Thanks for sharing Interesting Read! Very detailed blog.
Thanks for sharing

]]> Comment on Chair’s Message – SSI Qld Journal Mar07 by Lmwfdgcq http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-mar07/#comment-1239 Lmwfdgcq Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:22:06 +0000 http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/03/02/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-mar07/#comment-1239 Thanks!, Thanks!,

]]> Comment on Chair’s Message – SSI Qld Journal July07 by Tomt2U http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-july07/#comment-738 Tomt2U Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:56:43 +0000 http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-july07/#comment-738 Thanks. The Spatial Sciences Institute (SSI) is really starting to powerup in promoting the spatial profession within the Asia-Pacific. Thanks. The Spatial Sciences Institute (SSI) is really starting to powerup in promoting the spatial profession within the Asia-Pacific.

]]> Comment on Chair’s Message – SSI Qld Journal July07 by arbitrage-ppc http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-july07/#comment-735 arbitrage-ppc Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:53:02 +0000 http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/06/19/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-july07/#comment-735 Great site and interesting reading Great site and interesting reading

]]> Comment on Chair’s Message – SSI Qld Journal Jan07 by Got GPS Maps? http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-jan07/#comment-82 Got GPS Maps? Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:59:24 +0000 http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2007/01/04/chairs-message-ssi-qld-journal-jan07/#comment-82 Fantastic site! I really like what you have done with it. If you get a chance, check out my site on FREE GPS Map Downloads. We are the top-rated GPS Map Download Source on the net! Michael http://gpsmapsoftware.go-article.com Fantastic site! I really like what you have done with it. If you get a chance, check out my site on FREE GPS Map Downloads. We are the top-rated GPS Map Download Source on the net!

Michael
http://gpsmapsoftware.go-article.com

]]> Comment on Is Keyhole Markup Language (KML) becoming the defacto Spatial Transfer Protocol? by Tomt http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2006/06/26/is-keyhole-markup-language-kml-becoming-the-defacto-spatial-transfer-protocol/#comment-7 Tomt Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:04:01 +0000 https://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2006/06/26/is-keyhole-markup-language-kml-becoming-the-defacto-spatial-transfer-protocol/#comment-7 Carl Thankyou for your interest in my (dated) blog. It was (then) meant to open the eyes of fellow spatial scientists to the likely impacts from Google's drive into our sphere. I am looking forward to learn how OGC's 'Mass Market' working group is going to join-the-dots between the established spatial information community and the rapidly developing mass geospatial market. ISO I fear is a goliath who may be left behind. With NASA's drive using GEarth as a viewer in coming months, I think it imperative that some cohesive industry stds exist to build our future interoperabilty/integratability initiatives. I turn to OGC for that foundation. ciao Tomt Carl

Thankyou for your interest in my (dated) blog. It was (then) meant to open the eyes of fellow spatial scientists to the likely impacts from Google’s drive into our sphere. I am looking forward to learn how OGC’s ‘Mass Market’ working group is going to join-the-dots between the established spatial information community and the rapidly developing mass geospatial market. ISO I fear is a goliath who may be left behind.

With NASA’s drive using GEarth as a viewer in coming months, I think it imperative that some cohesive industry stds exist to build our future interoperabilty/integratability initiatives. I turn to OGC for that foundation.

ciao
Tomt

]]> Comment on Is Keyhole Markup Language (KML) becoming the defacto Spatial Transfer Protocol? by Carl Reed http://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2006/06/26/is-keyhole-markup-language-kml-becoming-the-defacto-spatial-transfer-protocol/#comment-6 Carl Reed Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:38:47 +0000 https://tomt2u.wordpress.com/2006/06/26/is-keyhole-markup-language-kml-becoming-the-defacto-spatial-transfer-protocol/#comment-6 Tomt Just happened to find your blog. There is a fundamental confusion in the geo-community mindset regarding the problem domains that KML and GML solve. Yes, there is some overlap in functionality. However, these are not competing standards - and yes, I would suggest that KML has become a de-facto standard. The OGC membership discussed the market perception of KML and GML at our face to face meetings last week. There is agreement that we need a document (white paper) that describes the respective roles of GML and KML. Stay tuned for some interesting announcements in this regard! Carl Tomt

Just happened to find your blog. There is a fundamental confusion in the geo-community mindset regarding the problem domains that KML and GML solve. Yes, there is some overlap in functionality. However, these are not competing standards – and yes, I would suggest that KML has become a de-facto standard.

The OGC membership discussed the market perception of KML and GML at our face to face meetings last week. There is agreement that we need a document (white paper) that describes the respective roles of GML and KML. Stay tuned for some interesting announcements in this regard!

Carl

]]>